AＣＳ ｗｅｅｋ３

ACS week 3 帐户 施乐园 This week is the first week of my internship. In terms of working experience, I used to work in China for two years as a Helpdesk analyst, but I have not had any Australian ICT industry so far. So I felt a little nervous and excited about this opportunity that professional year offered me. First day was all about the Administration tasks. In the second days of the week, I discussed my tasks and my internship expectation. Fortunately, I had a school assignment which is similar to this job using SAP. But the system structure and the data information are different from my internship. This is partly because that data is more complex in the real business environment and the business requirement is always fuzzy. In addition, the business intelligence tool is different, which also challenge me since I have to learn to utilize new software in a short time. Compared with the assignment I used to complete in university, the structure is similar, so it gives me a basic understand about this job. The real different in this job I think is to understand the business process and how to gather information from the database, most importantly; extracting data from database is a critical part in this job. Overall, I will focus on the business intelligence interface first. Question 3 You are faced with a situation you feel may be unethical. How would you set about analysing the situation? Think about the ethical analysis process, not the potential ethical dilemma. What questions do you need to ask? What facts do you need to consider? What, or who – might help you in your analysis? Use the Ethical Framework provided by the 3-step method of the Center for Ethics and Business Write 150-250 words, to answer this question. If you wish, choose a specific example of an unethical situation; either fictional, or that you have actually experienced. Discuss with your classmates the different approaches you each have taken and try to explain why there are differences. I would like to illustrate this example by using a specific situation that I encounter before. A friend of my is a IT enthusiast, whose interest is in internet working, he was introduced to use a hacker software. He was on a business trip in Melbourne, his broadband was near the limit. So maybe he just wanted to take some advantage or show off his technique or skills. He hacked in the network that nearby, so he can use the network for free. I think I would still use some ethic analysis process adapting from the framework. For instance, I need to think about who will be affected in this situation. Obviously, it was the internet owner who might be slow down. I also have to think about the value in this situation, as a IT professional, it looks like we steal some valuable thing. so it is un ethical. Also it is against the law. . Question 4 Where you are working in your internship, locate your company's values statement or code of ethics and ask your supervisor if you can either link to it from the company website in the discussion forum or reproduce it in the forum. If your supervisor refuses permission, or there is no values statement or code of ethics, prepare one for their use based on the reading you have done. You might model it on one you have come across. If you need, look at the Western Australia Public Sector Code of Ethics as a guide. Write 100-200 words to evaluate the code of ethics or values statement, whichever you are working with, against this week’s readings. Discuss what is good about it, what might be missing and how it could be improved. The Monash College 's value states that Discussion Guidelines (Week 3) 1. Minimum number of posts required this week is 7 (marks will be deducted if you post fewer). 2. To keep the signal to noise ratio down, all posts must add to the meaning of the discussion and not just be a conversation. 3. Answers must be written concisely; marks will be deducted if you “write a lot, but say nothing”. 4. A quiz does not count as a post. Remember marks are awarded on your work as follows: 0 marks if there has been no reading of seminar and module overview as applicable in the week. 1 mark if reading of the seminar/module overview as applicable, has happened 2 marks if seminar/module reading has occurred and there is some quality work but it is not of sufficient quantity and/or timeliness 3 marks if above conditions are met and it has appropriate references to support the argument and discussion. 4 marks if all the requirements in 1, 2 & 3 above are present and the work demonstrates a high quality of engagement and thought.